Sector Carrier Class Antennas webinar with Microcom Technologies


RF Genie

Recommended Posts

  • 1 year later...

@n21roadie- Not really. It main functions are forming the beams so both the Vertical and Horizontal coverage areas are the same and then reducing back radiation. You may see some improved co-location on top an bottom depending on what sector you compare it to, but for the most part you should use vertical space separation like other sectors. Or you should look at our Horns for the best isolation in all directions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Tasos said:

@n21roadie- Not really. It main functions are forming the beams so both the Vertical and Horizontal coverage areas are the same and then reducing back radiation. You may see some improved co-location on top an bottom depending on what sector you compare it to, but for the most part you should use vertical space separation like other sectors. Or you should look at our Horns for the best isolation in all directions.

We current only use for sectors - RF Elements SEC-CC-5-17 ( which I believe is now discontinued!) we space them about 1+ meters vertically apart, we have tried first generation

of horns but it appears from listening to the webinars the alignment of 30/40 degree horns are super critical? 

Also we are a little confused by the mounting of the second generation horns (  https://rfelements.com/products/wireless-broadband/asymmetrical-horn-tp-antennas/overview#60-asymmetrical-beam-antenna-hg3-tp-a60with asymmetric beam pattern should the longest part of the horn opening be horizontal (in the above example 342mm side be horizontal?) 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...